Economics Conference "Commitment to Africa" Initiative
9 - 11 December 2012 in Berlin, Germany
“Clash of interests?” Between economic aspirations and social Responsibility”
How development cooperation needs to be configured in future in order to
ensure it takes place within a framework of partnership while involving as much
of the population as possible
Zitto Kabwe’s intervention:
Clash of interests? Between Economic aspirations and social responsibility
In this brief presentation, we evaluate the implications of encouraging a major
role for the private sector in responding to social needs (societal development)
and at the same time promoting their own aspirations (profit and market share).
We then identify the possible areas for partnership. In Africa the interest
between the private companies and communities must highly be aligned.
Private companies have been for ages defining their interests as simply profit
maximization and side-lining the communities and the society they make that
profit from. The mindset is increasingly changing but in a narrower way; that
Social responsibility is charity instead of acting responsibly and sustainably. We
will try to define CSR broadly and underline factors that influence businesses to
act in a responsible way. The presentation ends with an example of a business
that is successful in achieving both goals.
By definition, a successful business will aim at improving itself through growth
(Maximizing the profits and injecting them back into the business) market control
(mastering the rules of demand and supply) and distributing benefit to its
shareholders. This is how business was done for years and is still done in some
enterprises.
Critics of business as development actors will argue that busnesses:
Contribute to economic development, but not human development or
wellbeing
Focus on value appropriation than value creation
Inefficient use of resources
Add to social problems and economic inequality
Undermine government role and capabilities
Do not account for the external impact of their activities
In Africa, there are many examples of corporations acting in an irresponsible
way, and the reason is believed to be their pursuit of profit and financial
performance. Some of the challenges we see are linked to tax payment,
corruption, illicit money transfer, money laundry etc.
However, some companies acting in a very responsible way are performing
financially as well (or better) than irresponsible companies, even in the absence
of coercion. What motivates their responsible behaviours? How do they
reconcile their business aspiration and social responsibility?
The methods mainly based on financial engineering worked until the actors in
the market started changing their ethics, their models and their own aspirations.
At this point businesses had to become creative and innovative, and had to
analyse the context, then adapt to the new changes. In the late 60’s early 70’s
businesses became increasingly aware of the fact that their activities had
positive and negative impacts not only on the shareholder, but to a group of
people, and that compliance with fair rules that benefited the stakeholders had
a positive impact on their financial performances (aspirations)
What is corporate social responsibility?
CSR is not just the charity actions conducted by the company in the
communities where it operates, CSR is not an action. CSR is a behaviour and
can be defined as a process that aims at influencing the company action in
order to maximise its positive impact on its stakeholders (consumers, employees,
competitors communities, governments etc.) or its surrounding (natural
environment, political environment, governance etc.). In Africa, private
companies from developed world perform what they label as CSR in issues like
schools buildings or rehabilitation etc. Of course, requesting more school
rehabilitation or more mosquito nets would result in a negative performance in
their financial books. At the same time, some of these companies use
accounting technics to transfer most of their revenues to offshore and pay less
tax in African countries or don’t pay at all. This is charity and corruption in two
different sides of the coin. A socially responsible corporation must pay its taxes
responsibly as well.
Amongst many responsible CSR examples, training their employees in new
technologies of production and keeping their health and safety records
positive, business save money and increase their performance. CSR becomes
not a specific action done to avoid reputation damage or sanctions, but
participates in the business model to maximize profits for all stakeholders. This
means that business should act in a socially responsible way because all the
area of their value chain would increase their profits if various stakeholders
benefit from the business performance and vice versa. By paying their taxes to
governments companies enable governments to pursue their mandate
properly. By denouncing corruption they participate in sustaining a healthy
environment for business etc.
As a business rolls out and creates its value chain, it goes through a number of
stages, and all these stages are organised in a way that meets the corporate
objectives as defined in the business aspiration. Just like in the above example
of paying tax and avoiding corruption, it is increasingly proven that if the
interests of all shareholders are taken into consideration at these stages,
businesses would benefit more. These areas are:
Job creation/recruitment
Research and Development
(R&D)/ Market study
Process Innovation
Product Innovation
Education and Training
Infrastructure and Investment
Health and
Safety Standards
New Products and
Services
Business Networks
Taxation/rent
Social Innovation
Self-Regulation
Provision of Public Goods
Social and Economic
We are distributing a two page case study on a successful business that has had
great impact in the development of local communities in Africa as well as a
high profitability, by focussing on key areas that we have just mentioned. While
reading the document, please focus on the elements we mentioned as being
common to CSR and business development (research funding by donors,
models adapted to the local socio economic context, ethics and participation
to the millennium goals, profitability to the company and high stakeholderfriendly value chain).
Unfortunately, in African countries not all business perform so well in CSR and for
local communities to fully benefit from their presence. Some of the institutional
elements need a particular attention from northern countries as the area of
scope goes beyond the territorial competency of a single country.
For example, Africa is being robbed of its resources through tax avoidance
done by Multinationals. Between year 2000 and 2010 more than USD 844bn was
flown out of Developing countries yearly through capital flight and 69% of this
was from Africa (Global Financial Integrity report 2011).
The global FDI inflow in 2011 was 1.5 trillion USD (UNCTAD 2012) while Capital
flight from developing countries is averaged at 0.84 trillion USD per year and
0.58trn USD of this money is from Sub-Saharan Africa. The total FDI to Africa was
a mere 37 billion USD in 2011 almost same figure to total foreign Aid flows to Sub
Sahara Africa. So while a total amount of 538 billions of USD leaves Africa illicitly
as proceeds of bribery, theft, kickbacks and tax evasion and avoidance, only
around 80bn USD flow into Africa as FDI and Aid combined. In every 1 USD
coming to Africa, 7 USD illicitly leaves Africa! This is unacceptable and
henceforth must be mainstreamed into Development cooperation agenda.
What are the possible areas to look at for partnerships?
In order for business to express their CSR in the most beneficial way for
stakeholders, they are influenced by:
Good domestic tax law that raise the price of irresponsible behaviours
and reward companies that act responsibly in their countries of
operations.
Well organised institutions –both normative and cultural- with a clear
framework. A set of standard best practices that could serve as a
guideline in specific fields.
Increased competition between businesses to emulate good behaviours
Increasing transparency and strong governance issues
Independent organisations monitoring businesses behaviours and
mobilising to change it.
Participation of businesses in academic and research fields
Their membership to associations of several business sharing the same
ethics and promoting CSR
The main challenge is the creation of institutional framework with countries in
Africa to stop capital flight as Countries in the north have a role to play in this
change, given the money flow from north to south and more so vice versa.
It is therefore important for governments in Europe and in Africa to consider the
above elements and focus on friendly laws, researches and networking, in order
to foster the participation of businesses into development of developing
countries.
Countries like Switzerland and other tax havens facilitate this illicit money transfer
by maintaining policies that obstruct any transparency efforts. Countries like
these are participating in the process of impoverishing Africa. Friendly countries
like Germany shall help to bring to the attention of these countries that Africa
will no longer entertain this robbing.
My country is a top recipient of foreign aid after Iraq and Afghanistan but more
than third of the population is still anguishing in poverty. This is the same for
many Africa countries. Transformational Development Cooperation is that of
empowering the people to take care of their own lives. Germany must up its
efforts in pushing for governance issues in Africa especially in exploitation of
Africa’s natural resources. Germany must support African countries in ending
illicit money flows through capital flight done by multinational corporations.
Germany must encourage its private sector, especially SMEs to invest in Africa.
Africa is rising as dubbed by The Economist. Africa is the future of the world.
Africa can work with Europe as equal partners. Interests of the companies and
of the society can be aligned and clash isn’t inevitable.
I conclude this paper by arguing that the future of Development Cooperation is
that of Empowerment which ends a donor-recipient relation between
developing countries and developed ones. A development cooperation whose
pillar is simply on Aid has failed; it has not produced the expected results for
almost half a century. This is better illustrated by one of my favourite quotes from
Mwalimu Nyerere:
"[A] man is developing himself when he grows, or earns, enough to provide
decent conditions for himself and his family; he is not being developed if
someone gives him these things." Julius Kambarage Nyerere, from his
book Uhuru na Maendeleo (Freedom and Development), 1973.
Thank you.
Zitto Zuberi Kabwe, MP
2 comments:
Hii imekaa kiubembelezaji hawa watu hawafai hata kama ni Wajerumani kama hawasikii kilio chetu hawatufai missaaada pasipo kuzibiti rushwa na utoroshaji wa Resources Hawatufai.
Hii...
Mimi makisio mawazo yako na hii ni nzuri sana na makala na habari kubwa. na shukrani kwa ajili ya kugawana.
Financial engineering courses
Post a Comment